Farnsworth v Information Commissioner: [2024] UKUT 206 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Citron on 12 July 2024.

Read the full decision in .

Judicial Summary

Environmental Information Regulations 2014 - exceptions to the duty to disclose - regulation 12(4)(d) - material in the course of completion etc - First-tier Tribunal struck out appellant鈥檚 appeal under rule 8(3)(c) (no realistic prospects of success) - appellant was litigant in person - appellant鈥檚 grounds did not articulate how Information Commissioner鈥檚 decision was legally wrong but appellant鈥檚 legal case was reasonably evident from the accompanying papers - the true issue was whether a report by third party consultants to the council (on a planning application) was an unfinished document or not - Held: the appeal did engage the jurisdiction of the tribunal and had realistic, rather than fanciful, prospect of success - First-tier Tribunal鈥檚 decision on application to strike out set aside and remade - strike out refused.

Updates to this page

Published 15 August 2024