Press release

Curbing compensation culture: Government to ban referral fees

Rising insurance costs will be tackled by a ban on referral fees, announced as part of Government鈥檚 commitment to curb compensation culture.

This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government

The Government will ban the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases. The current arrangements have led to high costs, encouraged a compensation culture and led to the growth of an industry which pursues claimants for profit. Insurance companies inevitably pass the costs they incur through increased compensation claims directly onto motorists and those with other insurance policies, unnecessarily forcing up the cost of living.

An example of a referral fee might be:

  • You have an accident and you are induced through a TV advert or SMS text message to make a 鈥榥o-win, no-fee鈥� claim.
  • Your claim is passed between claims management companies (who advertise compensation claims for accidents), insurance companies, lawyers and others who charge each other a referral fee for 鈥榬eferring鈥� the claim up the line.
  • The lawyer sues for compensation. If he wins, he can recover his costs and his 鈥渘o-win, no-fee鈥� mark-up on his costs from the losing defendant (or often the defendant鈥檚 insurance company) which will cover the amount he paid out as a referral fee. So the lawyer may pay hundreds of pounds as a referral fee because he knows he can get the money back.
  • To cover the loss, losing insurance companies are forced to raise premiums, private companies are forced to put up prices, and public authorities pass the burden on to the taxpayer.

Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly said:

鈥楾he 鈥榥o-win, no-fee鈥� system is pushing us into a compensation culture in which middle men make a tidy profit which the rest of us end up paying for through higher insurance premiums and higher prices. 鈥楬onest motorists are seeing their premiums hiked up as insurance companies cover the increasing costs of more and more compensation claims. Many of the claims are spurious and only happen because the current system allows too many people to profit from minor accidents and incidents.

鈥楻eferral fees are one symptom of the compensation culture problem and too much money sloshing through the system. People are being encouraged to sue, at no risk to themselves, leaving schools, business and individuals living in fear of being dragged to the courts for simply going about daily life.

鈥榃e will ban referral fees and we will go further. We have proposals before Parliament to end the bizarre situation in which people have no stake in the legal costs their cases bring. This will make claimants think harder about whether to sue and give insurance companies and business generally an incentive to pass the savings onto customers through lower prices.鈥�

The Government鈥檚 proposals currently before Parliament focus on stopping losing defendants having to pay a 鈥榮uccess fee鈥� to reimburse the claimant鈥檚 lawyer for other unconnected cases he may have lost. The Government is changing the law so that in future the person making the claim will have to pay the success fee, rather than the defendant, and that fee will be capped. The intended result is a fairer split of costs between parties, and lower legal costs overall which means lower costs to pass on to customers or taxpayers.

The proposals follow a Ministry of Justice consultation published in November 2010. Much of the evidence base for this consultation came from an independent Review of Civil Litigation Costs carried out by a senior judge, Lord Justice Jackson, and commissioned by the Master of the Rolls.

Notes to Editors

  1. Please note there is no universally recognised definition of 鈥榬eferral fees鈥�. Various agreements have been reported between many types of organisations including insurance companies, repair garages, emergency services and not all these agreements include actual fees. The scope of today鈥檚 announcement of a ban will cover the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases.
  2. The proposals before Parliament are contained in the .
  3. The Bill itself is published on the - the relevant section is Part 2.
  4. Lord Justice Jackson鈥檚 Review of Civil Litigation Costs was published by the judiciary and is available via聽on the .
  5. For more details, please contact Ministry of Justice press office on 020 3334 3536.

Updates to this page

Published 9 September 2011