Solvency II
GAD supported the government by formally advising HM Treasury in its response to a consultation on Solvency II.
The Government Actuary鈥檚 Department (GAD) played a key supporting role in HM Treasury鈥檚 review of Solvency II. This governs the prudential regulation of insurance firms in the UK.
HM Treasury has published its response to its consultation on the Review of Solvency II with GAD formally advising HM Treasury in the review鈥檚 latter stages.
The consultation response announced that the:
- 鈥榬isk margin鈥�, a capital buffer that insurance companies must hold, will be cut by 65% for life insurers and 30% for general insurers
- eligibility of assets that life insurers can use to match their liabilities will be broadened
- existing methodology for calculating the 鈥榤atching adjustment鈥� benefit will be largely maintained
GAD鈥檚 role
Our role involved exploring and balancing views of the Bank of England and industry respondents to proposed changes to the matching adjustment.
In the consultation, HM Treasury had proposed to change the way in which the matching adjustment is calculated, as part of the reforms.
The matching adjustment allows life insurers, who match their long-term liabilities with eligible long-term assets, to hold less capital against future liabilities. Less capital is required to be held since insurers that match their asset and liability cashflows are less exposed to liquidity risk.
The proposed changes were intended to improve policyholder protection but would have negatively impacted HM Treasury鈥檚 other objectives for the review. This would have been due to:
- increased capital requirements for life insurers
- increased volatility of life insurer鈥檚 financial positions
- other perceived negative consequences
The consultation response confirmed that the existing methodology for calculating the matching adjustment will be largely maintained. This followed months of engagement between the government, industry and the regulator.
GAD actuary Steve Lewis led on the project and said: 鈥淭here will be an adjustment to the methodology so that the matching adjustment becomes more sensitive to changes in the credit risk of the matching assets.
鈥淲e were pleased to be able to support HM Treasury with this highly technical area of the Solvency II regulations.鈥�