188体育

In this section

• 1.1.1. Service brake pedal or hand lever pivot
• 1.1.2. Service brake pedal or hand lever condition and travel
• 1.1.3. Air and vacuum systems
• 1.1.4. Low-pressure warning
• 1.1.5. Hand operated brake control valve
• 1.1.6. Parking brake lever or control
• 1.1.7. Brake valves
• 1.1.8. Not in use
• 1.1.9. Pressure storage reservoirs
• 1.1.10. Brake servo units and master cylinder (hydraulic systems)
• 1.1.11. Rigid brake pipes
• 1.1.12. Flexible brake hoses
• 1.1.13. Brake linings and pads
• 1.1.14. Brake discs and drums
• 1.1.15. Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
• 1.1.16. Brake actuators - including spring brakes, hydraulic cylinders and callipers
• 1.1.17. Load sensing valve
• 1.1.18. Brake slack adjuster
• 1.1.19. Additional braking device (retarder), if fitted
• 1.1.20. Not in use
• 1.1.21. Complete braking system

---

1.1.1. Service brake pedal or hand lever pivot

Defect	Category
(a) Pivot too tight	Major
(b) Excessive wear or free play	Major

1.1.2. Service brake pedal or hand lever condition and travel

A brake pedal rubber is an anti-slip material and is therefore not regarded as a defect if it鈥檚 worn smooth.

A brake pedal without a rubber usually has grooves or raised sections to provide grip in wet conditions and should be rejected if it鈥檚 worn smooth. However, some vehicles may have been manufactured with a brake pedal which did not incorporate grooves or the fitting of an anti-slip material and these should not be rejected.

You should reject a brake pedal if its grooves or raised grip sections are worn smooth. However, you should not reject a brake pedal if the vehicle has been manufactured with one that does not have grooves or anti-slip material.

Often a vehicle is fitted with an aftermarket brake pedal rubber. It is not a defect if the design pattern of the brake pedal rubber is worn smooth.

A vehicle should only be failed for insufficient reserve if the pedal or lever is touching the floor/handlebar. Checks on vehicles with power-assisted braking systems should be carried out with the engine off.

It may be possible on motorcycle derived systems for the brake lever to touch the handlebar. In such cases the extent of reserve travel should be assessed during the brake test.

Defect	Category
(a) Insufficient reserve travel	Major
(b) Service brake control: (i) not releasing correctly (ii) functionality of brakes affected	Minor Major
(c) Anti-slip provision missing, loose or worn smooth	Major

1.1.3. Air and vacuum systems

Vehicles first used before 1 October 1937 do not need to be tested for air and vacuum systems.

A vehicle with an ULW up to and including 3,050kg, with a reservoir coupled direct to the induction manifold or a reservoir integral in a servo unit, does not need to be fitted with a warning device.

To check the build-up of air or vacuum:

1. Completely empty the reservoir by repeatedly pressing the service brake pedal.

2. Start the engine and run it at just below the governed speed if diesel, or at 2,000rpm if petrol.

3. Check the time it takes for the warning device to stop operating. Pressure build-up is considered satisfactory if the warning device stops operating within:

• 3 minutes for pressure systems
• 1 minute for vacuum systems

For checks that require reference to a pressure or vacuum gauge warning mark, but no warning mark is present, the following reference values should be used:

• 45psi (3.1kg/cm2 or 3 bar) for a pressure gauge
• 10鈥� to 12鈥� (25 to 30cm) for a vacuum gauge

Defect	Category
(a) Insufficient pressure/vacuum assistance for less than: (i) four brake applications after the warning device has operated (or gauge shows an unsafe reading) (ii) two brake applications after warning device has operated (or gauge shows an unsafe reading)	Major Dangerous
(b) Time taken to build up air pressure/vacuum to safe working value not in accordance with the requirements	Major
(c) Repeated operation of any ancillary air or vacuum system completely depletes the stored air or vacuum for the braking system	Major
(d) Air leak causing a noticeable drop in pressure or audible air leak	Major
(e) External damage likely to affect the function of the braking system	Major

1.1.4. Low-pressure warning

Vehicles first used before 1 October 1937 do not need to be tested for low-pressure warning.

A vehicle with an ULW up to and including 3,050kg with a reservoir coupled direct to the induction manifold or a reservoir integral in a servo unit, is not necessarily required to be fitted with a warning device.

Warning devices may be visual or audible but only one needs to work if both are fitted.

Some vehicles with full power hydraulic braking systems will illuminate the low-pressure warning light as soon as the ignition is switched on. It is not a defect unless the warning light stays on after the engine has been started.

Defect	Category
(a) Low-pressure warning gauge or indicator: (i) malfunctioning or defective (ii) not identifying low-pressure	Minor Major

1.1.5. Hand operated brake control valve

All vehicles with a secondary brake control - in addition to or in place of the normal parking brake lever - must be inspected.

Defect	Category
(a) Control cracked, damaged or excessively worn	Major
(b) Control insecure on valve or valve insecure	Major
(c) Loose connections or leaks in the system	Major
(d) Malfunctioning	Major

1.1.6. Parking brake lever or control

Vehicles first used before 1906 do not need to have a parking brake.

Some defects in this sub-section may not apply to the type of parking brake fitted.

A parking brake lever must have obvious excessive travel before being rejected.

An electronic parking brake (EPB) may apply automatically in certain conditions, such as when the ignition is switched off or when the driver鈥檚 door is opened. Testers should be aware of this throughout the test.

Electronic parking brakes must be maintained in operation by direct mechanical means, even though they are applied electronically. However, the mechanism for keeping the brakes applied is usually within brake calliper or motor gear assembly and therefore not easy to see.

Hydraulic parking brakes as an only means of operation are not acceptable on vehicles first used on or after 1 January 1968. However, they may be used to assist the application or release of a mechanical brake.

Quadricycles may be fitted with one of the following types of parking brake:

• an over-centre lever that is mounted on handlebars
• a gear lever that operates a cable when it鈥檚 moved into the park position
• a transmission lock, which is the 鈥楶鈥� position on machines with continuously variable transmission (CVT)

These machines are type approved and should not be rejected for design features that prevent them from meeting the stated requirements.

If the parking brake is the 鈥楶鈥� position on the gearbox, the efficiency of the brake cannot be tested. The tester must therefore assess the brake by using a gradient (ideally 16%), or by attempting to push the machine when 鈥楶鈥� is selected.

The over-centre lever type can be brake tested as normal using one of the approved test methods.

Defect	Category
(a) Ratchet not holding correctly	Major
(b) Parking brake lever pivot or ratchet mechanism: (i) obviously worn (ii) worn to the extent that the brake may inadvertently release	Minor Major
(c) Parking brake lever has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment	Major
(d) Parking brake control missing, defective or inoperative	Major
(e) Electronic parking brake MIL indicates a malfunction	Major
(f) Parking brake is not capable of being maintained in operation by direct mechanical action only (vehicle first used on or after 1 January 1968)	Major

1.1.7. Brake valves

Defect	Category
(a) Valve: (i) damaged or excessive air leak (ii) leaking such that brake functionality is affected	Major Dangerous
(b) Excessive oil discharge from a compressor or brake valve	Minor
(c) Valve insecure or inadequately mounted	Major
(d) Hydraulic fluid: (i) leak from a brake valve (ii) leak from a brake valve such that brake functionality is affected	Major Dangerous

1.1.8. Not in use

1.1.9. Pressure storage reservoirs

Vehicles first used on 1 October 1937 or later must have their air and air/hydraulic braking systems inspected.

Defect	Category
(a) Reservoir: (i) has minor damage or corrosion (ii) heavily damaged, heavily corroded or leaking	Minor Major
(b) Drain device on an air brake system: (i) operation affected (ii) inoperative	Minor Major
(c) Reservoir insecure or inadequately mounted	Major

1.1.10. Brake servo units and master cylinder (hydraulic systems)

Hydraulic brake fluid level checks are confined to transparent reservoirs or where an indicator is fitted. Reservoir caps should not be removed.

A brake fluid warning lamp may be shared with other components, for example to indicate that brake pads are worn or the parking brake is applied. Class 3 vehicles are not inspected for brake fluid warning lamp.

To check the brake vacuum servo:

1. Make sure the engine is switched off.

2. Deplete the stored vacuum by repeatedly applying the service brake.

3. Fully apply the brake and hold at a constant pressure.

4. Start the engine.

5. Note if the pedal can be felt to travel further.

Defect	Category
(a) Brake servo: (i) defective or ineffective (ii) inoperative	Major Dangerous
(b) Master cylinder: (i) defective but brake still operating (ii) leaking	Major Dangerous
(c) Master cylinder insecure	Major
(d) Brake fluid: (i) below minimum mark (ii) significantly below minimum mark (iii) not visible	Minor Major Dangerous
(e) Master cylinder reservoir cap missing	Major
(f) Brake fluid warning light illuminated or defective	Minor
(g) Incorrect functioning of brake fluid level warning device	Minor

1.1.11. Rigid brake pipes

If the metal brake pipes have surface dirt that needs to be removed before it鈥檚 possible to assess their condition, you can lightly scrape the pipe with a specialist brake pipe corrosion tool or the corrosion assessment tool 鈥榮pade end鈥�. It must be done with care so that any protective coating does not get damaged.

Chafing, corrosion or damage to a rigid brake pipe so that its wall thickness is reduced by 1/3 (approximately 0.25mm for typical hydraulic brake pipe) justifies rejection, although it鈥檚 accepted that this is not easy to determine. If you are not sure whether the pipe is sufficiently deteriorated to justify rejection, you should give the benefit of the doubt.

Repairs to the pressure lines of hydraulic brake systems are unacceptable unless suitable connectors are used. Compression joints of a type using separate ferrules are not suitable.

Unacceptable repairs to brake lines should be failed using RfR 1.1.21 (d)

Defect	Category
(a) Brake pipe is at imminent risk of failure or fracture	Dangerous
(b) Leaking brake pipe or connection: (i) on an air brake system (ii) on a hydraulic system	Major Dangerous
(c) Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded	Major
(d) Brake pipe: (i) inadequately clipped or supported (ii) likely to become detached or damaged	Minor Major

1.1.12. Flexible brake hoses

You should reject a hose for being excessively damaged or chafed only if it鈥檚 severe enough to expose the reinforcement.

Defect	Category
(a) Brake hose damaged and likely to fail	Dangerous
(b) Flexible brake hose: (i) slightly damaged, chafed or twisted (ii) excessively damaged, deteriorated, chafed, twisted or stretched	Minor Major
(c) Brake hoses or connections leaking on: (i) air brake systems (ii) hydraulic systems	Major Dangerous
(d) Brake hose bulging under pressure	Major
(e) Brake hose porous	Major
(f) Brake hose ferrules: (i) excessively corroded (ii) excessively corroded and likely to fail	Major Dangerous

1.1.13. Brake linings and pads

Some brake pads have metal wear indicators so that when the pads become excessively worn the metal indicator touches the disc making a squealing sound. Other pads may have a cut, which if worn away indicates that the pad must be replaced.

An illuminated brake wear indicator is not a reason for failure.

Defect	Category
(a) Brake lining or pad: (i) worn down to wear indicator (ii) worn below 1.5mm	Major Dangerous
(b) Brake lining or pad contaminated with oil, grease etc.	Major
(c) Brake lining or pad missing or incorrectly mounted	Dangerous

1.1.14. Brake discs and drums

A brake disc or drum must be significantly worn before you should reject it. Being worn below the manufacturer鈥檚 recommended limits is not a reason in itself.

Defect	Category
(a) Brake disc or drum: (i) significantly and obviously worn (ii) insecure, fractured or otherwise likely to fail	Major Dangerous
(b) Contaminated with oil, grease etc.	Major
(c) Missing	Dangerous
(d) Brake drum back plate insecure	Major

1.1.15. Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages

Defect	Category
(a) Cable damaged or knotted	Major
(b) Component excessively worn or corroded	Major
(c) Cable, rod or joint insecure	Major
(d) Cable guide defective affecting operation	Major
(e) Restriction in free movement of the braking system	Major
(f) Abnormal movement of levers indicating maladjustment or excessive wear	Major

1.1.16. Brake actuators - including spring brakes, hydraulic cylinders and callipers

Defect	Category
(a) Actuator cracked or damaged and: (i) braking performance not affected (ii) braking performance affected	Major Dangerous
(b) Actuator leaking and: (i) braking performance not affected (ii) braking performance affected	Major Dangerous
(c) Actuator insecure or inadequately mounted and: (i) braking performance not affected (ii) braking performance affected	Major Dangerous
(d) Actuator: (i) excessively corroded (ii) excessively corroded and likely to crack	Major Dangerous
(e) Actuator has: (i) excessive travel of operating system indicating need for adjustment (ii) no reserve travel and braking performance affected	Major Dangerous

1.1.17. Load sensing valve

Defect	Category
(a) Load sensing valve linkage defective	Major
(b) Load sensing valve linkage obviously incorrectly adjusted	Major
(c) Load sensing valve seized or inoperative and: (i) ABS functioning (ii) ABS not fitted or inoperative	Major Dangerous
(d) Load sensing valve missing where fitted as standard	Dangerous

1.1.18. Brake slack adjuster

Defect	Category
(a) Adjuster damaged, seized or having abnormal movement, excessive wear or incorrect adjustment	Major
(b) Adjuster defective	Major
(c) Incorrectly installed	Major

1.1.19. Additional braking device (retarder), if fitted

An endurance braking system, such as an exhaust brake or electronic retarder is only likely to be fitted to some large motor caravans and category M2 and M3 vehicles.

Defect	Category
(a) Endurance braking system connectors or mountings: (i) insecure (ii) insecure and functionality affected	Minor Major
(b) Endurance braking system obviously defective	Major

1.1.20. Not in use

1.1.21. Complete braking system

You must check the strength and continuity of the vehicle鈥檚 load bearing members and their supporting structure or panelling around any braking component mounting.

Check the presence and security of any retaining and locking devices.

The presence and effectiveness of some locking devices, such as locking fluid or 鈥榥yloc鈥� nuts, cannot be easily determined. If you are not certain that a locking device is missing or ineffective, you should give the benefit of the doubt.

Guidance for assessing corrosion and use of the corrosion assessment tool can be found in Appendix A.

Defect	Category
(a) Other braking system (e.g. antifreeze pump, air dryer etc.) component damaged or corroded: (i) to the extent that the braking system is adversely affected (ii) leaking and system functionality adversely affected	Major Dangerous
(b) Air or antifreeze: (i) leaking (ii) to the extent that braking performance is affected	Minor Major
(c) Any component insecure or inadequately mounted	Major
(d) Braking system component modification: (i) unsafe (ii) adversely affecting braking performance	Major Dangerous
(e) The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any braking system actuation component mounting (a prescribed area): (i) is significantly reduced (see Appendix A) (ii) is so weakened that the functionality of the braking system is affected	Major Dangerous
(f) Brake retaining or locking device ineffective or missing	Major

In this section

• 1.2.1. Performance
• 1.2.2. Efficiency

---

1.2.1. Performance

You must ensure that the vehicle is in a safe condition for the test to be carried out.

The primary brake tester must be used unless the vehicle is unsuitable due to its drive configuration, transmission type or braking system. If this is the case, a full or partial decelerometer test may be appropriate. You should consider any additional information from the vehicle manufacturer.

When conducting a test on a roller brake tester (RBT) where more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock the efficiency requirements for that system are considered to be met.

Alternatively, the efficiency requirements are met if the front wheels lock on the service brake of an unladen Class 7 vehicle with at least a 100kg force at each rear wheel for a two-axle vehicle, or at least 50kg force at each rear wheel on a three-axle vehicle.

When testing using an Automated RBT or a plate brake tester, the vehicle test weight for Classes 3 and 4 is the weight shown by the brake test equipment.

For non-automated roller brake testers the brake test weight must be obtained from a brake data chart or other reliable source.

For Class 7 use the DGW from the manufacture鈥檚 plate or, the nominal DGW of 2,600kg if using a plate brake tester and the presented weight is less than 2,000kg.

For Class 5 use the lesser of the DGW or maximum authorised mass (MAM) from the manufacturer鈥檚 plate. On vehicles where only the ULW is displayed, you must calculate the DGW by multiplying the number of passenger seats by 63.5kg and adding the ULW, for example: 52 seats 脳 63.5kg = 3302kg + 5,250kg ULW = 8552kg.

Vehicles of unknown test weight can be tested on either an RBT or plate brake tester (PBT). However, if the number of wheel locks are not achieved for any system on a non-ATL RBT, a decelerometer test must be used to establish the overall brake efficiency of the relevant system(s).

Certain converted passenger vehicles, such as motor caravans and ambulances, may have a kerb weight greatly in excess of the base model weight displayed by the MOT testing service. In these circumstances, the vehicle should be treated as having an unknown test weight.

Additional braking devices, such as electronic retarders, should not be operated during the brake test.

Some tricycles with two brake controls may have a linked braking system. The brake force used in the efficiency calculation is the total from all wheels when operated by that control only.

Using a roller brake tester

Ensure that the vehicle, or system, under test is suitable for testing using a roller brake tester. If the vehicle or system is unsuitable, it should be tested with a decelerometer.

ATL test procedure

Automated test lane (ATL) approved test stations should position the front wheels of the vehicle in the rollers of the brake tester and follow the sequence of instructions as displayed and prompted on screen. If a vehicle is ejected from the brake rollers, the required brake efforts may not be achieved. In such cases the test should be repeated in manual mode, running each roller individually.

Non - ATL test procedure

You are permitted to use an alternative procedure to that specified below as long as all the testable elements are adequately covered.

1. Position the wheels of the first axle to be tested in the brake rollers and then run both sets of rollers together in a forward direction until the vehicle is aligned. With the rollers still running, note whether a significant brake effort is recorded from any wheel without a brake being applied.

2. Gradually apply the service brake and watch how the braking effort for each wheel increases. Stopping short of lock up or maximum effort, hold a steady pedal pressure and check there is no excessive brake effort fluctuation with each revolution of the road wheel.

3. Gradually release the service brake and observe how the braking effort at each wheel reduces.

4. Gradually depress the service brake again, this time until maximum effort is achieved, or until the wheel locks and slips on the rollers. Stop the rollers.

5. Record the reading at which the maximum braking effort is achieved and whether brake 鈥渓ock-up鈥� occurs. Stop the rollers if they have not stopped automatically.

6. Place the wheels of the next axle in the brake rollers and repeat the above procedure.

When checking maximum effort, testers can elect to run the brake rollers individually or together, depending on the suitability of the RBT. However, if the rollers are run together and the vehicle fails to meet the minimum performance requirement, the test must be repeated running the rollers individually.

If both rollers are run together, it will almost certainly be necessary to chock the wheels that are not being tested.

Using a plate brake tester

For vehicles other than Class 7, establish the actual presented weight of the vehicle.

For Class 7 vehicles, the brake efficiency will be calculated using one of the following:

• the actual design gross weight (DGW) where the presented weight is at least 2,000kg (the DGW is obtained from the manufacturer鈥檚 plate fitted to the vehicle)
• a nominal DGW figure of 2,600kg if the presented weight is less than 2,000kg

To use a plate brake tester:

1. Enter the appropriate data to conduct the test.

2. For each check, drive the vehicle forwards at a steady speed of about 4mph up to the plate tester.

3. On the first run, just before the wheels are on the plate high friction surfaces, apply a light constant pressure to the brake pedal. Do not stop on the tester. Take note of the way the brake efforts fluctuate.

4. On the second run, as soon as the wheels are on the plate high friction braking surfaces, apply the service brake progressively until maximum effort is achieved.

5. Take note of the way the brake efforts increase and the maximum values achieved.

If a vehicle fails any aspect of the plate brake test, the check should be repeated to confirm the result.

Using a decelerometer

If the vehicle or system cannot be tested on a roller brake tester, set up the decelerometer in the vehicle in accordance with the equipment manufacturer鈥檚 instructions.

1. Drive the vehicle on a level road at a steady speed of approximately 20mph (32kph) and progressively apply the service brake to maximum.

2. Note whether the vehicle or steering pulls severely one way and the brake efficiency recorded.

Before carrying out a decelerometer test on the public highway, testers must ensure they are suitably qualified to drive the vehicle and are familiar with the controls. If a vehicle has special controls, such as in disability vehicles, the vehicle presenter should be allowed to drive during the test if he/she wishes.

Calculating brake imbalance

For the majority of vehicles, the MOT testing service will calculate brake imbalance automatically. However, when this is not the case, such as for tricycles and quadricycles or if MTS is not working, you must calculate the brake imbalance against the maximum brake efforts on each axle in the following way:

Disregard any brake imbalance across an axle if the lower recorded effort is as a result of a locked wheel or if the higher brake effort from a wheel is not more than 40kg.

The check for rear axle brake imbalance does not apply to tricycles or quadricycles.

鈥淣ot tested鈥� or 鈥淯nable to be tested鈥� must only be used where it becomes apparent during the test that the particular item cannot be tested, and this could not have been identified prior to starting the test. The reason for selecting the failure must be included in the additional information box.

Defect	Category
(a) Braking effort: (i) inadequate at a wheel (ii) not recording at a wheel	Major Dangerous
(b) Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: (i) the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight line (ii) the braking effort from any wheel is less than 50% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on a steered axle	Major Dangerous
(c) A brake on any wheel grabbing severely	Major
(d) Abnormal lag in brake operation on a wheel	Major
(e) Excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution	Major
(f) Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake	Major
(g) Brake performance unable to be tested	Major

1.2.2. Efficiency

Manufacturer鈥檚 plates

Vehicles first used before 1 August 1980 may not have a manufacturer鈥檚 plate.

Most manufacturer鈥檚 plates will usually show four weights:

• Design Gross Weight - The maximum weight of the vehicle and any load carried
• Design Train Weight 鈥� The maximum combined weight of the vehicle and any trailer towed
• Maximum front axle weight
• Maximum rear axle weight

Three-axle vehicles will show an additional maximum axle weight.

Some vehicles will not show a train weight because they have not been designed to tow a trailer.

Goods vehicles may show two columns of weights.

In these cases, one column will be the maximum design weights and the other column will be the maximum permissible weights in Great Britain, otherwise known as Maximum Authorised Mass (MAM).

Where a Design Gross Weight is not shown, then the Gross GB Weight or MAM is used for brake percentage efficiency calculations on vehicles in Class 7.

Note: On goods vehicles presented with a 鈥楳inistry鈥� plate (VTG6 or VTG6T) then the information displayed on that plate will always override the information displayed on the Manufacturer鈥檚 plate.

The registration number and chassis number on the 鈥楳inistry鈥� plate must always be cross checked to ensure the plate relates to that vehicle.鈥�

An example of a manufacturer鈥檚 plate can be found in Section 2 of the Introduction.

Calculating brake efficiency

For most vehicles the MOT testing service will calculate brake efficiencies automatically.

If MTS is not working, add the brake efforts from each wheel for the system that is being tested and carry out the following calculation:

The vehicle test weight will depend on the vehicle test class.

For Classes 3 and 4 use the weight shown by the brake test equipment. Otherwise, take the weight from a weight data chart or some other reliable source.

For quadricycles and three-wheeled vehicles in Class 4 with two brake controls, one control must achieve an efficiency of at least 30% and the other control 25%.

The efficiency calculation for each control is the total from the wheel(s) when operated by that control only.

If the vehicle can be tested using the RBT, test the brakes in the normal way and note the readings.

Manually calculate the service brake test results. Note: the percentage efficiency for each control still has to be met.

Efficiency % = (Total brake effort from control 1)/(Vehicle test weight) x 100

Efficiency % = (Total brake effort from control 2)/(Vehicle test weight) x 100

For Class 7 use the DGW from the manufacture鈥檚 plate or, the nominal DGW of 2,600kg if using a plate brake tester and the presented weight is less than 2,000kg.

For Class 5 use the lesser of the DGW or maximum authorised mass (MAM) from the manufacturer鈥檚 plate. On vehicles where only the ULW is displayed, you must calculate the DGW by multiplying the number of passenger seats by 63.5kg (or 140lbs) and adding the ULW, for example: 52 seats 脳 63.5kg = 3302kg + 5,250kg ULW = 8552kg

When conducting a test on a roller brake tester (RBT) where more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock the efficiency requirements for that system are considered to be met.

Efficiency requirements

For vehicle category definitions see the 鈥楢bbreviations and definitions鈥� in the 鈥業ntroduction鈥�.

Vehicle type	Efficiency requirement
M1 vehicles having a service brake operating on at least 4 wheels and which were first used: - on or after 1 September 2010 - before 1 September 2010	58% 50%
N1 vehicles	50%
M2 and M3 vehicles having a service brake operating on at least 4 wheels which were first used: - on or after 1 January 1968 - before 1 January 1968	50% 45%
L2 and L6 vehicles with a single service brake control that operates the brakes on all wheels	40%
L5 vehicles with a single service brake control that operates the brakes on all wheels which were first used: - on or after 1 January 1968 - before 1 January 1968	50% 40%
L7 vehicles with a single service brake control that operates the brakes on all wheels	50%
Vehicles first used before 1 January 1968 which do NOT have one means of control operating on at least 4 wheels and which have one brake system with two means of control or two brake systems with separate means of control	30% from 1st means of control 25% from 2nd means of control
Any L category vehicle with two service brake systems each having a separate means of operation	30% from 1st means of control 25% from 2nd means of control
Vehicles first used before 1 January 1915 only require one efficient braking system	No specific requirement

Brake test results

Brake efforts achieved during a test should be entered on the MOT testing service as follows:

Roller and plate brake tests:

1. Enter the brake effort from each wheel and whether they 鈥榣ock-up鈥�. The MOT testing service will automatically calculate the brake efficiency and out of balance results

2. Enter other defects manually.

There is no provision in MTS to calculate the service brake test results for quadricycles or three-wheeled vehicles in Class 4 with two brake controls.

Brake test results for Quadricycles:

On the 鈥楤rake test configuration鈥� screen, select dual braking system.

On the 鈥楢dd brake test results鈥� screen, for quadricycles enter the actual brake readings for both axles and manually calculate the efficiency for each control.

Record the service brake readings indicating that all wheels have locked, regardless of whether wheels have actually locked.

Brake test results for Class 4 Three-wheeled vehicles:

The recording of these vehicles is the same as for quadricycles.

On the 鈥楢dd brake test results鈥� screen divide the reading for the single wheel by 2 and enter this figure in both boxes for the axle with the single wheel.

If the 30% or the 25% requirements have not been met, the service brake result is a fail, enter a manual failure for brake efficiency as follows:

Add a defect:

1. Select 鈥楤rakes - Brake performance 鈥� Service brake performance 鈥� RBT鈥�

2. Select 鈥楽ervice brake efficiency (trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)鈥�

3. Select 鈥楽ervice brake efficiency below requirements鈥�

In the comments box state which control has failed acting on which axle.

Plate brake tests:

1. Enter the brake effort from each wheel. The MOT testing service will automatically calculate brake efficiency and out of balance results.

2. Enter other defects manually.

Decelerometer tests:

1. Enter the efficiencies recorded by the meter. The MOT testing service will automatically pass or fail the vehicle on brake efficiency.

2. Enter other defects manually.

If the MOT testing service is unavailable, refer to the latest edition of the MOT Testing Guide.

In cases where the required brake efficiency is only just met, but the tester knows that a higher performance figure is normally obtained for the vehicle type, the vehicle presenter should be informed.

Defect	Category
(a) Service brake efficiency: (i) below minimum requirement (ii) less than 50% of the required value	Major Dangerous

In this section

• 1.3.1. Performance
• 1.3.2. Efficiency

---

1.3.1. Performance

This inspection is only for vehicles with a single line braking system. If the secondary brake is also the park brake then there is no need to carry out a separate park brake test.

The secondary brake control may be the parking brake lever, or a separate brake control.

When testing transmission parking brakes, the minimum secondary brake efficiency requirement must be calculated before the brake is tested. As soon as the minimum efficiency requirement is reached the brake testing must cease to avoid any possible damage.

Using a roller brake tester

1. On each axle which has a secondary brake fitted, run the rollers and gradually apply the secondary brake keeping any 鈥渉old-on鈥� button or trigger disengaged the whole time, watching how the braking effort for each wheel increases.

2. Continue to apply the parking brake until maximum effort is achieved, or until the wheels lock and slip on the rollers. If the vehicle is ejected from the brake rollers, the required brake efforts may not be achieved, it will be necessary to repeat the test and chock the wheels which are not being tested.

3. Record the reading at which the maximum braking effort is achieved and whether the wheels locked. Stop the rollers if they have not stopped automatically.

Using a plate brake tester

1. Drive the vehicle forwards at a steady speed of about 4mph up to the plate tester.

2. As soon as the wheels are on the plate high friction braking surfaces, gradually apply the secondary brake, keeping any 鈥榟old-on鈥� button or trigger disengaged the whole time, until maximum effort is achieved.

3. Note the way in which the brake efforts increase and the maximum values achieved.

If a vehicle fails any aspect of the plate brake test, the check should be repeated to confirm the result.

Using a decelerometer

If the vehicle or system is of a type which cannot be tested on a roller brake tester, set up the decelerometer in the vehicle in accordance with the equipment manufacturer鈥檚 instructions.

1. Drive the vehicle on a level road at a steady speed of approximately 20mph (32kph) and progressively apply the secondary brake to maximum.

2. Note the recorded brake efficiency.

Brake test results

For details of entering brake test results, see Section 1.2.2.

Defect	Category
(a) Braking effort: (i) inadequate at any wheel (ii) not recording at any wheel	Major Dangerous
(b) Brakes imbalance across an axle such that: (i) the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. Or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight line. (ii) the braking effort from any wheel is less than 50% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on a steered axle	Major Dangerous
(c) A brake on any wheel grabbing severely	Major

1.3.2. Efficiency

When conducting a test on a roller brake tester (RBT) where more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock the efficiency requirements for that system are considered to be met.

Vehicles with a single line braking system must meet the following minimum secondary brake efficiency requirements:

Vehicle type	Efficiency requirement
M2 and M3 vehicles having a service brake operating on at least 4 wheels which were first used before 1 January 1968	20%
Vehicles first used before 1 January 1968 which do NOT have one means of control operating on at least 4 wheels and which have one brake system with two means of control or two brake systems with separate means of control	25% from 2nd means of control
All other vehicles	25%

Vehicles first used before 1 January 1915 must only have one efficient braking system.

Defect	Category
(a) Parking brake efficiency: (i) below minimum requirement (ii) less than 50% of the required value	Major Dangerous

In this section

• 1.4.1. Performance
• 1.4.2. Efficiency

---

1.4.1. Performance

You only need to inspect vehicles that have not already had the parking brake system tested as the secondary brake.

These vehicles must instead meet the secondary brake test requirements. For details see Section 1.3.1 and 1.3.2.

The primary brake tester must be used unless the vehicle is unsuitable due to its drive configuration, transmission type or braking system. If this is the case, a decelerometer or gradient test may be appropriate. A gradient test must only be carried out if the parking brake cannot be tested using the primary brake tester or decelerometer. This will usually only be necessary on certain all-wheel drive vehicles with electronic parking brakes where no vehicle technical information is available.

When testing transmission parking brakes, the minimum parking brake efficiency requirement must be calculated before the brake is tested. As soon as the minimum efficiency requirement is reached the brake testing must cease to avoid any possible damage.

A small number of large vehicles, such as some American motor caravans, have a parking brake which is not suitable for a dynamic brake test. In such cases a gradient test must be carried out.

Three-wheeled vehicles only require a parking brake on one wheel.

Using a roller brake tester

1. Run the rollers on each axle that has the parking brake fitted and gradually apply the parking brake, keeping any 鈥榟old-on鈥� button or trigger disengaged the whole time.

2. Continue to apply the brake until maximum effort is achieved, or until the wheels lock and slip on the rollers. If the vehicle is ejected from the brake rollers, the required brake efforts may not be achieved, it will be necessary to repeat the test and chock the wheels which are not being tested.

3. Record the reading at which the maximum braking effort is achieved and whether the wheels locked. Stop the rollers if they have not stopped automatically.

Large vehicles fitted with spring brakes, lock actuators or air assisted parking brakes may require an applied brake test for assessing parking brake efficiency. This test must only be conducted on an approved Class 5 roller brake tester with the appropriate 鈥楢pplied Brake Test鈥� programme.

1. Apply the parking brake fully and then release any power assistance. The service brake may be used to assist in setting the parking brake.

2. Start each brake roller in turn and note the recorded maximum effort.

Using a plate brake tester

1. Drive the vehicle forwards at a steady speed of about 4mph up to the plate tester.

2. As soon as the wheels are on the plate鈥檚 high friction braking surfaces, gradually apply the parking brake, keeping any 鈥渉old-on鈥� button or trigger disengaged the whole time, until maximum effort is achieved.

3. Note the maximum values achieved.

If a vehicle fails any aspect of the plate brake test, the check should be repeated to confirm the result.

Using a decelerometer

If the vehicle or system cannot be tested on a roller brake tester, set up the decelerometer in the vehicle as instructed by the equipment manufacturer.

1. Drive the vehicle on a level road at a steady speed of approximately 20mph (32kph) and progressively apply the parking brake to maximum.

2. Note the recorded brake efficiency.

Decelerometer brake testing must always be carried out on suitable roads with as little traffic as possible. A particular public road should not be used for tests so frequently that it could cause complaints from residents.

Using a gradient tester

A gradient test must only be carried out on vehicles that are not suitable for a parking brake test with the primary brake tester or decelerometer. This will usually only be necessary on certain all-wheel drive vehicles with electronic parking brakes where no vehicle technical information is available.

A suitable gradient is considered to be one which:

• is longer than the wheelbase of the vehicle
• is not more than 16%
• is as close to 16% as possible within a 3 mile radius of the testing station
• if on a public road is in a safe place to conduct the test

1. Reverse the vehicle onto the gradient.

2. Hold the vehicle on the service brake whilst setting the parking brake.

3. Release the service brake and note if the vehicle is held on the gradient.

Brake test results

For details of entering brake test results see Section 1.2.2.

Defect	Category
(a) Parking brake inoperative on one side, or in the case of testing on the road, the vehicle deviates excessively from a straight line	Major

1.4.2. Efficiency

You only need to inspect vehicles that have not already had the parking brake system tested as the secondary brake.

These vehicles must instead meet the secondary brake test requirements. For details see Section 1.3.1 and 1.3.2.

For details of conducting the test see Section 1.4.1.

M2 and M3 vehicles that were first used before 1 January 1968 and that have a service brake operating on at least 4 wheels, have no specified parking brake efficiency requirement. However, they must have a parking brake that can prevent at least two wheels from turning. For vehicle category definitions see 鈥楢bbreviations and definitions鈥� in the 鈥業ntroduction鈥�.

Vehicles first used before 1 January 1915 only need one efficient braking system. They do not need to meet a specified efficiency requirement.

All other vehicles must achieve a minimum parking brake efficiency of 16%.

When conducting a test on a roller brake tester (RBT) where more than half of the wheels of a brake system lock the efficiency requirements for that system are considered to be met.

Defect	Category
(a) Parking brake efficiency: (i) below minimum requirement (ii) less than 50% of the required value	Major Dangerous

You must inspect any additional braking device fitted, such as an electric or fluid retarder or an exhaust brake. It is not necessary to drive the vehicle to carry out this inspection.

Defect	Category
(a) Control for electronic retarder does not allow gradual variation in effort	Major
(b) System obviously inoperative	Major

You must inspect any ABS systems fitted.

When testing ABS equipped vehicles, the road wheels that are lifted off the ground should not be allowed to rotate when the ignition is on. This can cause the ABS system to indicate a fault which may require specialist equipment to rectify.

If the ABS has been intentionally rendered inoperative, the whole system must be removed. This does not apply to sensor rings or other ABS components which are an integral part of another component, such as a brake disc or drive shaft.

It鈥檚 not permissible to remove or disable the ABS from a vehicle first used on or after 1 January 2010. Not all vehicles first used on or after 1 January 2010 will have ABS, so the failure only applies where the system has obviously been removed.

Defect	Category
(a) Warning device not working	Major
(b) Warning device shows system malfunction	Major
(c) Wheel speed sensors missing or damaged	Major
(d) Wiring damaged	Major
(e) Other components missing or damaged	Major
(f) ABS system obviously removed	Major

You must inspect the warning lamp operation on vehicles with an electronically controlled braking system.

Defect	Category
(a) Warning device not working	Major
(b) Warning device shows system malfunction	Major

Hydraulic brake fluid level checks are confined to transparent reservoirs, reservoir caps should not be removed. On many vehicles, you will not be able to see if the brake fluid is contaminated. You should only fail a vehicle if you can clearly see that the fluid is contaminated.

Defect	Category
(a) Brake fluid contaminated	Major