IHTM42603 - Foreign element: additional test of domicile

If property in a settlement would otherwise be excluded property under s48 or s48ZA and the conditions of IHTA84/S80 or S81 are satisfied, then in order forÌýthe property to be excluded it may be necessary to also test the long-term UK residence or domicile status of more than one person or the same person on different dates. â€�Ìý

Consult with Technical at an early stage if the facts are not clearly covered by the guidance below, particularly ifâ€�Ìý

  • the various conditions were not satisfied immediatelyÌýprior to 6 April 2025 but could be on or after that date (there is a risk of an exit charge)Ìý

  • the conditions were satisfied immediatelyÌýprior to 6 April 2025 but are no longer satisfied on or after that date (in which case, there may now be relevant property subject to future charges, but with rate relief).Ìý

A: When IHTA84/S80 applies â€�Ìý

 When IHTA/s80 applies then the Act provides for a new, separate, deemedÌýtrust, together with a deemed commencement date and a deemed settlorâ€�(IHTM42231)Ìý

If the settlor of the deemed trust is a long-term UK resident (on or after 6 April 2025) or was domiciled in the UK (or deemed to be domiciled in the UK) (for times before 6 April 2025) at the deemed commencement date, then the foreign assets in the trust cannot be excluded property in the first place. â€�Ìý

However, if that settlor is not a long-term UK resident (on or after 6 April 2025) or not domiciled in the UK (before 6 April 2025) at the deemed commencement date then the foreign assets in the deemed trust can only be excluded property if an additionalÌýtest is met. â€�Ìý

The additionalÌýtest is that the settlor of the original trust must not be a long-term UK resident (on or after 6 April 2025) or not domiciled in the UK (before 6 April 2025) when the assets became comprisedÌýin the original trust. â€�Ìý

In summary, excluded property can only be available if both the original settlor and the deemed settlor were not connected to the UK by way of long-term UK residence or domicile. â€�Ìý

·¡³æ²¹³¾±è±ô±ðâ€�Ìý

Mr A died in 2019 and left his estate in trust for Mrs A for life and thereafter on trust for the wider family on discretionary trusts. Because the initialÌýtrust is an immediate post-death interest for her, IHTA/s80 is engaged. â€�Ìý

Neither were domiciled in the UK at that time.â€�Ìý

Scenario 1â€�Ìý

Mrs A died in 2024: this triggers the deemed settlement of which she is the settlor.â€�Ìý

If she was still non-domiciled at the time of her deathÌýthen the foreign assets in that trust are excluded property. â€�Ìý

And because Mr A â€� the actual settlor â€� was not UK domiciled on his death,Ìýthe additionalÌýtest is also satisfied so that for the purposes of charges within Ch III of the Act the foreign assets are still excluded property. â€�Ìý

Scenario 2â€�Ìý

Mrs A surrendered her interest to the trustees in 2024, when she had become UK deemedÌýdomiciled. AgainÌýthis triggers the deemed settlementÌýbut the foreign assets will not be excluded anywayÌýand an anniversary charge will arise in 2029 but with rate relief for the period between 2019-2024.â€�Ìý

Scenario 3â€�Ìý

Similarly, if Mrs A dies in 2027 while she is a long-term UK resident then the foreign assets in the deemed settlement would not be excluded property and again the additionalÌýtest of Mr A’s domicile in 2019 makes no difference with the same result as in Scenario 2 above.â€�Ìý

B: When IHTA84/S81 applies  â€�Ìý

If an event occurs such that property in a trust (“T1â€�) becomes comprisedÌýin another trust (“T2â€�) then, for the purposes of the charging provisions within Chapter III part III of the IHTA84 only, IHTA/S81 provides that the property is deemedÌýto remainÌýin T1. (IHTM42229) But if that event happens the availability of existing excluded property status for foreign property may need to be reviewed for the purposes of the IHT trust charges. â€�Ìý

Inter-trust transfers; times on or after 6 April 2025 â€�Ìý

The deeming under IHTA/S81 no longerÌýrequires excluded property to be retested.â€� It only depends on the status of the settlor of T1.â€�Ìý

In particularÌý

  • If the settlor of T1 (“S1â€�) is living at the time of the event then the status of the transferred property, before and after the transfer, depends solely on whether S1 is, or is not, a long-term UK resident. In other words, the transferred property (which is deemedÌýto remainÌýin T1) can only be excluded property if and for so long as S1 is notÌýa long-term UK resident. â€�Ìý

  • If S1 died before on or after 6 April 2025 the transferred property is excluded only if S1 was not a long-term resident immediatelyÌýbefore the death.â€�Ìý

  • If S1 had died before 6 April 2025 then the transferred property is excluded only if S1 was not domiciled in the UK when the property became comprisedÌýin T1.â€�Ìý

Inter-trust transfers; times prior to 6 April 2025Ìý

If the settlor of T1 was domiciled in the UK (or deemedÌýto be domiciled in the UK) when the assets became comprisedÌýin T1 then the foreign assets in the trust could not have been excluded property in the first place. â€�Ìý

However, if the settlor of T1 wasâ€�not  domiciledÌýin the UK when the assets originally became comprisedÌýin T1 then the transferred assets (which are deemedÌýto remainÌýin T1) could only have continued to have excluded property status if an additionalÌýdomicile test wasÌýmet.  â€�Ìý

The additionalÌýdomicile test depended upon the time when IHTA/s81 applies, i.e. the assets in T1 become comprisedÌýin T2. â€�Ìý

IHTA/S81 transfers prior to 22 July 2020â€�Ìý

The additionalÌýtest was that the settlor of T2 must also have been non-domiciled when the assets in T2 originally became comprisedÌýin T2 (IHTA/S82). â€�Ìý

Put simply, excluded property status would only be available for the transferred assets if the settlors of both T1 and T2 were historically non-domiciled.  Section 82 is now repealed for times on or after 6 April 2025.Ìý

IHTA/S81 transfers on or after 22 July 2020 (Finance Act 2020)â€�Ìý

The additionalÌýdomicile test was different and was set out in IHTA/S82A, which has also been repealed. â€�Ìý

The additionalÌýdomicile test focused on the domicile of the settlor of T1 or the domicile of the person that caused the assets to become comprisedÌýin T2. â€�Ìý

The trustees use their trust powers to transfer assets from T1 to T2.Ìý

In this case the transferred assets can only have continued to have excluded property status if the settlor of T1 was not domiciled in the UK at the time the assets are transferred to T2. â€�Ìý

And if further transfers were made from T2 to T3, say or from T2 back to T1 then these were known as  â€�qualifying transfers’ and the settlor of T1 must have remainedÌýnon-domiciled on each of these occasions. But if at the time of a qualifying transfer the settlor of T1 was UK domiciled then the transferred assets no longer had excluded property status. â€�Ìý

And if the settlor of T1 is no longer living at the time of a qualifying transfer (and the death is not a qualifying transfer) then the additionalÌýdomicile test was treated as satisfied. â€�Ìý

The assets were transferred to T2 because of an assignment or the exercise of a general power of appointmentâ€�Ìý

In this case the transferred assets remained excluded property status if at the time of an assignment or the exercise of the power (which must have occurred on or after 22 July 2020) the assignor or the power holder was neither domiciled nor deemedÌýdomiciled in the UK.â€�Ìý

Note that the assets may not have become comprisedÌýin T2 immediatelyÌýwhen the assignment was made or the power exercised. If the qualifying transfer occurs at a later timeÌýbut before 6 April 2025, then the assignor or power holder must not have been a formerly domiciled resident at the time the assets moved to T2â€�(as well as being non-domiciled at the time of the assignment or exercise). â€�Ìý

Consult with Technical at an early stage if the facts are not clearly covered by the guidance above including situations where there are transfers after 22 July 2020 that may be affected by earlier trust-to-trust transfers or where the analysis may depend on the effect of the judgment in Barclays Wealth v HMRC (2017) EWCAâ€�CivÌý1512.Ìý